The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a framework for understanding cross-cultural effectiveness. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on intrapersonal and interpersonal skills within a familiar context, CQ specifically addresses the capability to function effectively in culturally diverse settings. Researchers have identified four distinct dimensions of CQ: metacognitive (the ability to consciously process cultural knowledge), cognitive (knowledge of norms and practices), motivational (the drive to adapt), and behavioral (the capacity to exhibit appropriate verbal and nonverbal actions). A growing body of evidence suggests that high CQ is positively correlated with job performance in multinational teams, particularly when tasks require negotiation or conflict resolution. However, critics argue that the construct overlaps heavily with general cognitive ability and personality traits, questioning its unique predictive validity. Nevertheless, CQ remains a useful practical tool for training global managers, as it provides a structured way to develop intercultural competencies that are increasingly essential in a globalized economy.
❓ この文章で言及されている文化的知性の概念に対する批判の主な論点は何ですか?
A. A. それは感情的知性とあまりにも似ている。
B. B. トレーニングプログラムにおける実践的な応用が欠けている。
C. C. 既存の心理学的測定を超えた予測的価値を提供しない可能性がある。
D. D. それは交渉および紛争解決タスクにのみ適用されます。
✅ 正确答案
C. It may not offer predictive value beyond existing psychological measures.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first