雅思阅读

语言: 中文 English Español 日本語 한국어 Tiếng Việt ไทย Русский

📖 Reading Passage

The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a framework for understanding cross-cultural effectiveness. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on intrapersonal and interpersonal skills within a familiar context, CQ specifically addresses the capability to function effectively in culturally diverse settings. Researchers have identified four distinct dimensions of CQ: metacognitive (the ability to consciously process cultural knowledge), cognitive (knowledge of norms and practices), motivational (the drive to adapt), and behavioral (the capacity to exhibit appropriate verbal and nonverbal actions). A growing body of evidence suggests that high CQ is positively correlated with job performance in multinational teams, particularly when tasks require negotiation or conflict resolution. However, critics argue that the construct overlaps heavily with general cognitive ability and personality traits, questioning its unique predictive validity. Nevertheless, CQ remains a useful practical tool for training global managers, as it provides a structured way to develop intercultural competencies that are increasingly essential in a globalized economy.
❓ 본문에서 언급된 문화적 지능 개념에 대한 비판의 주요 요점은 무엇인가?

✅ 正确答案

C. It may not offer predictive value beyond existing psychological measures.

IELTS Reading Tips

🎯 在线练习并获得AI解析