The concept of 'neurodiversity' has gained traction in recent years, challenging the traditional medical model that pathologizes conditions such as autism and ADHD. Proponents argue that these neurological variations are natural human differences, not deficits, and should be accommodated rather than cured. This perspective emphasizes the unique strengths that neurodivergent individuals bring to society, such as heightened pattern recognition or creative problem-solving. However, critics caution that romanticizing neurodiversity may undermine the need for therapeutic interventions that can significantly improve quality of life for some individuals. They advocate for a balanced approach, recognizing both the value of diversity and the reality of disabling symptoms. Ultimately, the debate reflects a broader shift towards inclusive thinking, but it also raises complex questions about where to draw the line between acceptance and treatment.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 신경다양성 운동에 대한 비판자들이 제기하는 주요 우려는 무엇인가?
A. A) 이는 일부 개인에게 필요한 의료 지원이 소홀해질 수 있습니다.
B. B) 창의적 강점을 지나치게 강조하면서 논리적 능력을 무시한다.
C. C) 신경다양성인 사람들의 사회적 기여를 인정하지 못한다.
D. D) 이는 신경학적 상태를 낙인찍는 의학적 모델을 조장한다.
✅ 正确答案
A) It may lead to the neglect of necessary medical support for some individuals.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first