The concept of 'neurodiversity' has gained traction in recent years, challenging the traditional medical model that pathologizes conditions such as autism and ADHD. Proponents argue that these neurological variations are natural human differences, not deficits, and should be accommodated rather than cured. This perspective emphasizes the unique strengths that neurodivergent individuals bring to society, such as heightened pattern recognition or creative problem-solving. However, critics caution that romanticizing neurodiversity may undermine the need for therapeutic interventions that can significantly improve quality of life for some individuals. They advocate for a balanced approach, recognizing both the value of diversity and the reality of disabling symptoms. Ultimately, the debate reflects a broader shift towards inclusive thinking, but it also raises complex questions about where to draw the line between acceptance and treatment.
❓ この文章によると、神経多様性運動の批評家たちが提起する主な懸念は何ですか？
A. A) それは、一部の個人にとって必要な医療支援が軽視されることにつながる可能性がある。
B. B) それは創造的な強みを過度に重視し、論理的な能力を無視している。
C. C) 神経多様性を持つ人々の社会的貢献を認識していない。
D. D) それは神経学的状態をスティグマ化する医学モデルを促進する。
✅ 正确答案
A) It may lead to the neglect of necessary medical support for some individuals.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first