The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch, defined by humanity's profound impact on Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as radioactive fallout from nuclear tests, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies complex planetary changes and that the proposed markers do not align with the traditional timescales of geological epochs, which typically span millions of years. This debate highlights a fundamental tension between scientific classification and the urgent need to address environmental crises, as naming a new epoch could either galvanize policy action or, conversely, diminish the significance of human influence by framing it as merely another geological transition.
❓ passage에서 설명된 인류세(Anthropocene) 지지자와 비판자 사이의 주요 불일치 지점은 무엇인가?
A. 인간의 영향이 지질 기록에서 감지될 수 있는지 여부
B. 제안된 마커들이 충분한지, 그리고 그 개념이 지질학적 관례에 부합하는지 여부
C. 핵 실험이 플라스틱보다 더 많은 오염을 초래했는지 여부
D. 인류세가 현재의 지질시대를 완전히 대체해야 하는지 여부
✅ 正确答案
Whether the proposed markers are sufficient and whether the concept fits geological conventions
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first