The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch, defined by humanity's profound impact on Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as radioactive fallout from nuclear tests, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies complex planetary changes and that the proposed markers do not align with the traditional timescales of geological epochs, which typically span millions of years. This debate highlights a fundamental tension between scientific classification and the urgent need to address environmental crises, as naming a new epoch could either galvanize policy action or, conversely, diminish the significance of human influence by framing it as merely another geological transition.
❓ passageの中で述べられている人新世の支持者と批判者の間の主な意見の相違点は何ですか?
A. 人間の影響が地質学的記録において検出できるかどうか
B. 提案されたマーカーが十分であるかどうか、またその概念が地質学的慣例に適合するかどうか。
C. 核実験がプラスチックよりも多くの汚染を引き起こしたかどうか
D. アントロポセンが現在の時代を完全に置き換えるべきかどうか
✅ 正确答案
Whether the proposed markers are sufficient and whether the concept fits geological conventions
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first