The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been a subject of debate among geographers. This theory posits that the physical environment, particularly climate and topography, directly shapes human behavior and societal development. Early proponents, such as Ellsworth Huntington, argued that temperate climates fostered industriousness and innovation, while tropical regions supposedly led to lethargy and stagnation. However, this perspective has been heavily criticized for its simplification and potential to justify colonialism and racial hierarchies. Modern scholarship emphasizes 'possibilism', which acknowledges that while the environment offers constraints and opportunities, human agency and cultural choices play a pivotal role. For instance, the Netherlands, despite its cold, damp climate, has achieved remarkable agricultural productivity through technological innovation. Thus, contemporary geographers view the environment as one of many factors, not a deterministic force, in shaping human societies.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 환경 결정론이 비판을 받은 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A. 그것은 사회 발전에 있어 인간의 주체적 역할을 과도하게 강조한다.
B. B. 이는 환경과 사회 간의 관계를 지나치게 단순화하며, 비윤리적 관행을 정당화하는 데 사용되어 왔다.
C. C. 그것은 기후가 인간 행동에 미치는 영향을 전혀 무시한다.
D. D. 열대 지역에만 적용되며 온대 지역에는 적용되지 않는다.
✅ 正确答案
B. It oversimplifies the relationship between environment and society and has been used to justify unethical practices.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first