The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, elevated carbon dioxide levels, and nuclear fallout from atomic tests constitute a distinct stratigraphic signature. However, critics contend that the term is more culturally and politically charged than scientifically precise, noting that human activities have been altering the environment for millennia, albeit at varying intensities. They suggest that formalizing the Anthropocene might oversimplify the complex, diachronous nature of human-environment interactions, potentially masking regional disparities in environmental change. This debate underscores the broader challenge of integrating scientific data with societal narratives in defining our planetary future.
❓ Согласно тексту, критики формального определения антропоцена утверждают, что:
A. A. Воздействие человека на Землю слишком недавнее, чтобы считаться геологической эпохой.
B. B. Термин не отражает неравномерный и долгосрочный характер воздействия человека на окружающую среду.
C. C. Загрязнение пластиком и радиоактивные осадки не являются надёжными геологическими маркерами.
D. D. Эта концепция слишком научна и игнорирует культурные перспективы.
✅ 正确答案
B. The term fails to capture the uneven and long-term nature of human environmental influence.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first