The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, elevated carbon dioxide levels, and nuclear fallout from atomic tests constitute a distinct stratigraphic signature. However, critics contend that the term is more culturally and politically charged than scientifically precise, noting that human activities have been altering the environment for millennia, albeit at varying intensities. They suggest that formalizing the Anthropocene might oversimplify the complex, diachronous nature of human-environment interactions, potentially masking regional disparities in environmental change. This debate underscores the broader challenge of integrating scientific data with societal narratives in defining our planetary future.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 인류세를 공식적으로 정의하는 것에 대한 비판자들은 다음과 같이 주장한다:
A. A. 인간의 지구에 대한 영향은 지질학적 시대로 간주하기에는 너무 최근의 일이다.
B. B. 해당 용어는 인간의 환경 영향이 고르지 않고 장기적이라는 특성을 제대로 포착하지 못한다.
C. C. 플라스틱 오염과 핵 낙진은 신뢰할 수 있는 지질학적 지표가 아니다.
D. D. 그 개념은 너무 과학적이며 문화적 관점을 무시한다.
✅ 正确答案
B. The term fails to capture the uneven and long-term nature of human environmental influence.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first