The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, elevated carbon dioxide levels, and nuclear fallout from atomic tests constitute a distinct stratigraphic signature. However, critics contend that the term is more culturally and politically charged than scientifically precise, noting that human activities have been altering the environment for millennia, albeit at varying intensities. They suggest that formalizing the Anthropocene might oversimplify the complex, diachronous nature of human-environment interactions, potentially masking regional disparities in environmental change. This debate underscores the broader challenge of integrating scientific data with societal narratives in defining our planetary future.
❓ 根据文章所述,批评正式定义“人类世”的人士认为:
A. A. 人类对地球的影响过于近期,不足以被视为一个地质时代。
B. B. 该术语未能体现人类对环境影响的非均衡性与长期性特征。
C. C. 塑料污染和核沉降物并非可靠的地质标志。
D. D. 这一概念过于科学化,忽视了文化视角。
✅ 正确答案
B. The term fails to capture the uneven and long-term nature of human environmental influence.