The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, elevated carbon dioxide levels, and nuclear fallout from atomic tests constitute a distinct stratigraphic signature. However, critics contend that the term is more culturally and politically charged than scientifically precise, noting that human activities have been altering the environment for millennia, albeit at varying intensities. They suggest that formalizing the Anthropocene might oversimplify the complex, diachronous nature of human-environment interactions, potentially masking regional disparities in environmental change. This debate underscores the broader challenge of integrating scientific data with societal narratives in defining our planetary future.
❓ 本文によると、正式に人新世を定義することへの批判者たちは、次のように主張している:
A. A. 人間の地球への影響は地質学的な時代区分と見なすにはあまりにも最近のことである。
B. B. この用語は、人間の環境への影響が不均一かつ長期的である性質を捉え損ねている。
C. C. プラスチック汚染と核降下物は、信頼できる地質学的指標ではない。
D. D. その概念は科学的すぎて、文化的視点を無視している。
✅ 正确答案
B. The term fails to capture the uneven and long-term nature of human environmental influence.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first