The concept of 'environmental justice' emerged in the 1980s, highlighting the disproportionate burden of environmental hazards borne by marginalized communities. Unlike traditional environmentalism, which often focuses on wilderness preservation, environmental justice prioritizes human well-being, particularly for low-income and minority groups. Research has shown that polluting facilities, such as waste incinerators and chemical plants, are frequently sited in areas with lower property values, where residents have less political influence. This pattern is not coincidental but results from historical zoning policies and systemic inequalities. Advocates argue that achieving environmental justice requires not only equitable distribution of environmental benefits and harms but also meaningful participation of affected communities in decision-making processes. Consequently, the movement has broadened the scope of environmental policy, linking it to social equity, public health, and democratic governance.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 전통적 환경주의와 환경 정의 사이의 핵심 차이점은 무엇인가?
A. 전통적 환경주의는 인간 건강에 초점을 맞추는 반면, 환경 정의는 자연 그대로의 황야에 초점을 맞춘다.
B. 환경 정의는 소외된 집단의 공평한 대우를 강조하는 반면, 전통적 환경주의는 종종 자연 보존을 우선시한다.
C. 전통적 환경주의는 환경 정의보다 구역 지정 정책에 더 관심을 둔다.
D. 환경 정의는 지역 사회가 정책 결정에 참여하는 것을 거부한다.
✅ 正确答案
Environmental justice emphasizes equitable treatment of marginalized groups, while traditional environmentalism often prioritizes nature preservation.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first