The concept of 'environmental carrying capacity' has long been central to ecological theory, yet its application to human societies remains contentious. While traditional models assume a fixed threshold beyond which a population cannot grow without collapsing, contemporary scholars argue that technological innovation and trade can effectively raise this limit. However, such optimism is tempered by evidence that resource depletion and pollution often outpace adaptive measures, particularly in regions lacking robust governance. A 2021 study of coastal megacities demonstrated that despite advanced water recycling systems, none achieved full sustainability, suggesting that infrastructural solutions alone are insufficient. Instead, the authors propose a socio-ecological framework that integrates behavioral change, policy reform, and economic incentives, acknowledging that human systems are not merely passive responders to environmental limits but active shapers of them.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 환경 수용력을 해결하기 위해 기술적 해결책에만 의존할 때의 주요 한계는 무엇인가?
A. A. 그들은 대부분의 개발도상 지역에 비용이 너무 비쌉니다.
B. B. 그들은 인간 행동과 정책의 역할을 설명하지 못한다.
C. C. 그들은 어떤 실제 상황에서도 효과가 입증된 적이 없다.
D. D. 그들은 오직 해안 대도시에서만 시행될 수 있다.
✅ 正确答案
B. They fail to account for the role of human behavior and policy.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first