The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a measure of an individual's ability to function effectively in culturally diverse settings. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on interpersonal sensitivity within a single cultural context, CQ comprises four distinct dimensions: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral. The metacognitive dimension refers to the conscious awareness of cultural assumptions during interactions, while the cognitive dimension encompasses knowledge of norms and practices in different cultures. Motivational CQ drives interest and confidence in adapting to cross-cultural encounters, and behavioral CQ involves the flexibility to modify verbal and nonverbal actions appropriately. Research suggests that high CQ correlates with better job performance in multinational teams, yet critics argue that the construct overlaps significantly with general cognitive ability and personality traits, questioning its unique predictive validity. Nevertheless, CQ training programs have proliferated, assuming that these capabilities can be systematically developed through targeted interventions.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 문화 지능(CQ)에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. A) 감성 지능과 너무 유사하여 별개의 개념이 될 수 없다.
B. B) 일반적인 인지 능력과 성격을 넘어서는 독특한 예측력을 갖지 못할 수 있다.
C. C) 행동 유연성에 너무 초점을 맞추고 지식 습득을 무시한다.
D. D) CQ 프로그램의 광범위한 채택에도 불구하고, 그것은 훈련 가능하지 않다.
✅ 正确答案
B) It may not have unique predictive power beyond general cognitive ability and personality.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first