The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a measure of an individual's ability to function effectively in culturally diverse settings. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on interpersonal sensitivity within a single cultural context, CQ comprises four distinct dimensions: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral. The metacognitive dimension refers to the conscious awareness of cultural assumptions during interactions, while the cognitive dimension encompasses knowledge of norms and practices in different cultures. Motivational CQ drives interest and confidence in adapting to cross-cultural encounters, and behavioral CQ involves the flexibility to modify verbal and nonverbal actions appropriately. Research suggests that high CQ correlates with better job performance in multinational teams, yet critics argue that the construct overlaps significantly with general cognitive ability and personality traits, questioning its unique predictive validity. Nevertheless, CQ training programs have proliferated, assuming that these capabilities can be systematically developed through targeted interventions.
❓ この文章によると、文化的知性(CQ)に対する主な批判は何ですか?
A. A) それは感情的知性とあまりにも似ており、独立した概念とは言えません。
B. B) それは、一般的な認知能力や性格を超えた独自の予測力を持たない可能性がある。
C. C) それは行動の柔軟性に焦点を当てすぎており、知識の習得を無視している。
D. D) CQプログラムが広く採用されているにもかかわらず、それは訓練可能ではない。
✅ 正确答案
B) It may not have unique predictive power beyond general cognitive ability and personality.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first