The concept of 'environmental justice' has evolved significantly since its inception in the 1980s, when it primarily addressed the disproportionate burden of pollution borne by minority and low-income communities in the United States. Over time, the framework has expanded to encompass global dimensions, including climate change impacts on developing nations and the transboundary movement of hazardous waste. Scholars argue that environmental justice now requires a multidimensional approach, integrating social equity, ecological sustainability, and economic viability. However, critics contend that the broadening of the term risks diluting its original focus on racial and class disparities, potentially undermining targeted policy interventions. Despite this debate, the core principle remains: no community should bear an unjust share of environmental harms, and all populations deserve equitable access to environmental benefits and decision-making processes.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 환경 정의의 진화에 대해 비평가들이 제기하는 주요 우려 사항은 무엇인가?
A. A) 이 용어는 인종적 격차에 너무 좁게 초점이 맞춰지게 되었다.
B. B) 개념의 확장은 특정 사회적 불평등에 대한 원래의 강조점을 약화시킬 수 있다.
C. C) 환경 정의는 이제 기후 변화가 개발도상국에 미치는 영향을 무시하고 있다.
D. D) 이 프레임워크는 경제적 고려 사항을 통합하지 못했습니다.
✅ 正确答案
B) The expansion of the concept may weaken its original emphasis on specific social inequalities.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first