The concept of 'environmental justice' has evolved significantly since its inception in the 1980s, when it primarily addressed the disproportionate burden of pollution borne by minority and low-income communities in the United States. Over time, the framework has expanded to encompass global dimensions, including climate change impacts on developing nations and the transboundary movement of hazardous waste. Scholars argue that environmental justice now requires a multidimensional approach, integrating social equity, ecological sustainability, and economic viability. However, critics contend that the broadening of the term risks diluting its original focus on racial and class disparities, potentially undermining targeted policy interventions. Despite this debate, the core principle remains: no community should bear an unjust share of environmental harms, and all populations deserve equitable access to environmental benefits and decision-making processes.
❓ Согласно тексту, какова основная проблема, поднятая критиками в отношении эволюции экологической справедливости?
A. A) Термин стал слишком узко сосредоточен на расовых различиях.
B. B) Расширение концепции может ослабить её первоначальный акцент на конкретных социальных неравенствах.
C. C) Экологическая справедливость теперь игнорирует влияние изменения климата на развивающиеся страны.
D. D) Данная структура не смогла учесть экономические соображения.
✅ 正确答案
B) The expansion of the concept may weaken its original emphasis on specific social inequalities.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first