The concept of 'environmental justice' has evolved significantly since its inception in the 1980s, when it primarily addressed the disproportionate burden of pollution borne by minority and low-income communities in the United States. Over time, the framework has expanded to encompass global dimensions, including climate change impacts on developing nations and the transboundary movement of hazardous waste. Scholars argue that environmental justice now requires a multidimensional approach, integrating social equity, ecological sustainability, and economic viability. However, critics contend that the broadening of the term risks diluting its original focus on racial and class disparities, potentially undermining targeted policy interventions. Despite this debate, the core principle remains: no community should bear an unjust share of environmental harms, and all populations deserve equitable access to environmental benefits and decision-making processes.
❓ 根据文章内容,批评者对环境正义演变提出的主要关切是什么?
A. 该术语已变得过于狭隘地聚焦于种族差异。
B. B) 概念的扩展可能会削弱其最初对特定社会不平等的强调。
C. C) 环境正义现在忽视了气候变化对发展中国家的影响。
D. D) 该框架未能纳入经济考量。
✅ 正确答案
B) The expansion of the concept may weaken its original emphasis on specific social inequalities.