第308篇 秦攻赵平原君使人请救于魏

出处:战国策·秦策五

语言: 中文 English Español 日本語 한국어 Tiếng Việt ไทย Русский

📜 原文(文言文)

秦攻赵,平原君使人请救于魏。信陵君发兵至邯郸城下,秦兵罢。虞卿为平原君请益地,谓赵王曰:“夫不斗一卒,不顿一戟,而解二国患者,平原君之力也。用人之力而忘人之功,不可。”赵王曰:“善。”将益之地。平原君闻之,谓虞卿曰:“君以请益地,何也?”虞卿曰:“夫王以君为有功,故益地。君以王为无功,故辞。然则王之不益地,与君之辞地,其失均也。君不如受之,以成王之德。”平原君曰:“受之,是吾以力取之也,非所以成王德也。”遂不受。

📖 白话文翻译

When the state of Qin attacked Zhao, the Lord of Pingyuan sent envoys to Wei to seek aid. The Lord of Xinling led his army to the walls of Handan, and the Qin forces withdrew. Yu Qing then petitioned on behalf of the Lord of Pingyuan for an enlargement of his fief, saying to the King of Zhao: "Without the loss of a single soldier, without the breaking of a single halberd, two states were delivered from calamity—this is the achievement of the Lord of Pingyuan. To avail oneself of another's strength yet forget his merit is impermissible." The King of Zhao said, "Well spoken." He was about to enlarge the Lord of Pingyuan's fief. When the Lord of Pingyuan heard of this, he said to Yu Qing, "Why have you sought an enlargement of my fief on my behalf?" Yu Qing replied, "The King deems you meritorious, and therefore enlarges your fief. If you deem the King lacking in grace and thus decline, then the King's failure to enlarge the fief and your refusal of it would be faults of equal measure. It were better that you accept the fief, so as to perfect the King's grace." The Lord of Pingyuan said, "To accept the fief would be to obtain it by force of arms—this is not the way to perfect the King's grace." Thereupon he did not accept it.

💡 商战启示录

Lord Pingyuan's refusal of the fief embodies a supreme wisdom of commerce—declining to monetize personal merit while maximizing brand value. In modern business terms, this parallels a founder who forgoes short-term cashing out in favor of long-term equity commitment, preserving the purity of corporate governance and market trust. For instance, Ren Zhengfei of Huawei holds merely about 1% of the company's shares, yet through an employee stock ownership plan, he unites hearts and fosters a culture of "collective endeavor"—far more potent in shaping the corporate soul than demanding hefty dividends outright. Yu Qing's plea for "additional land" resembles a professional manager negotiating stock options with the board, but Lord Pingyuan discerned the underlying "agency problem"—if reward is tied to force, one risks being branded a "power-hungry minister amassing wealth," tarnishing the intangible asset of his "virtuous noble" persona. Contrast this with certain internet companies whose executives rush to cash out before an IPO, reaping short-term gains only to witness stock crashes and reputational ruin. Lord Pingyuan's refusal was, in essence, a conversion of immediate profit into long-term reputational capital, leveraging the label of "selflessness" to secure enduring support from feudal lords and the populace—a nascent blueprint for what modern enterprises call a "stakeholder symbiosis ecosystem." In the arena of competition, the most refined strategy is not seizing the cake at hand, but yielding immediate gains to command the power of rule-making and discourse. Lord Pingyuan relinquished land, yet won deeper trust from the King of Zhao and the acclaim of后世 historians—the return on this "intangible asset" far exceeding any fief.