The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human activity. However, critics contend that the term is more cultural than scientific, noting that geological epochs are typically defined by natural, global-scale events, not by human-induced changes that vary widely across regions. They also question the utility of formalizing a new epoch when the impacts of human activity are still unfolding and may not leave a consistent, long-term record in the rock strata. This debate highlights the tension between scientific classification and societal awareness of environmental change.
❓ Какова основная точка разногласий относительно термина «антропоцен»?
A. A. Достаточно ли значительны воздействия человека, чтобы изменить системы Земли
B. B. Следует ли формализовать этот термин как геологическую эпоху, учитывая его региональную изменчивость и продолжающийся характер.
C. C. Являются ли радиоактивные осадки и пластиковое загрязнение надёжными маркерами деятельности человека
D. D. Следует ли учёным уделять больше внимания культурным аспектам изменения окружающей среды
✅ 正确答案
B. Whether the term should be formalized as a geological epoch given its regional variability and ongoing nature
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first