The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human activity. However, critics contend that the term is more cultural than scientific, noting that geological epochs are typically defined by natural, global-scale events, not by human-induced changes that vary widely across regions. They also question the utility of formalizing a new epoch when the impacts of human activity are still unfolding and may not leave a consistent, long-term record in the rock strata. This debate highlights the tension between scientific classification and societal awareness of environmental change.
❓ 「Anthropocene」という用語をめぐる主な論争点は何ですか?
A. A. 人間の影響が地球のシステムを変えるほど重大であるかどうか
B. B. その用語が地質学的な時代として正式に定められるべきかどうかは、その地域的な変動性と進行中の性質を考慮すると疑問である。
C. C. 核降下物とプラスチック汚染が人間活動の信頼できる指標となるかどうか
D. D. 科学者は環境変化の文化的側面にもっと焦点を当てるべきかどうか
✅ 正确答案
B. Whether the term should be formalized as a geological epoch given its regional variability and ongoing nature
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first