The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human activity. However, critics contend that the term is more cultural than scientific, noting that geological epochs are typically defined by natural, global-scale events, not by human-induced changes that vary widely across regions. They also question the utility of formalizing a new epoch when the impacts of human activity are still unfolding and may not leave a consistent, long-term record in the rock strata. This debate highlights the tension between scientific classification and societal awareness of environmental change.
❓ 'Anthropocene'이라는 용어에 관한 주요 논쟁점은 무엇인가?
A. A. 인간의 영향이 지구 시스템을 변화시킬 만큼 충분히 중요한지 여부
B. B. 해당 용어가 지역적 변동성과 진행 중인 특성을 고려할 때 지질학적 시대로 공식화되어야 하는지 여부
C. C. 핵 낙진과 플라스틱 오염이 인간 활동의 신뢰할 수 있는 지표인지 여부
D. D. 과학자들이 환경 변화의 문화적 측면에 더 초점을 맞춰야 하는지 여부
✅ 正确答案
B. Whether the term should be formalized as a geological epoch given its regional variability and ongoing nature
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first