The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human activity. However, critics contend that the term is more cultural than scientific, noting that the formal recognition of an epoch requires globally synchronous and long-lasting geological signatures, which current human-induced changes may not fully satisfy. This debate highlights the intersection of scientific classification and societal awareness, raising questions about how we define and respond to our planetary influence.
❓ Согласно тексту, какова основная причина, по которой некоторые критики выступают против официального признания антропоцена геологической эпохой?
A. A. Антропогенные изменения пока не видны в геологических записях.
B. B. Предложенные маркеры не обладают глобальной синхронностью и долгосрочной геологической устойчивостью.
C. C. Радиоактивные осадки и загрязнение пластиком слишком незначительны, чтобы иметь существенное значение.
D. D. Этот термин был отвергнут всеми геологами и учёными-экологами.
✅ 正确答案
B. The proposed markers lack global synchrony and long-term geological persistence.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first