The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human activity. However, critics contend that the term is more cultural than scientific, noting that the formal recognition of an epoch requires globally synchronous and long-lasting geological signatures, which current human-induced changes may not fully satisfy. This debate highlights the intersection of scientific classification and societal awareness, raising questions about how we define and respond to our planetary influence.
❓ 本文によると、一部の批評家が人新世を地質時代として正式に認定することに反対する主な理由は何か。
A. A. 人為的な変化は、まだ地質学的記録には現れていない。
B. B. 提案されたマーカーは、地球規模での同時性と長期的な地質学的持続性を欠いている。
C. C. 核降下物やプラスチック汚染は、重要性を持つほど大きなものではない。
D. D. この用語は、すべての地質学者および環境科学者によって拒否されている。
✅ 正确答案
B. The proposed markers lack global synchrony and long-term geological persistence.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first