The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch, defined by humanity's profound impact on Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels are stratigraphically distinct, warranting formal recognition. However, critics contend that the term lacks precise temporal boundaries, as human influence began gradually across different regions and eras, from early agriculture to industrialization. This ambiguity, they suggest, undermines its utility as a formal chronostratigraphic unit, which typically requires a clear global boundary stratotype. Despite this debate, the term has proven invaluable for interdisciplinary dialogue, prompting scientists to consider the long-term consequences of human activity beyond traditional historical timescales.
❓ 일부 비평가들이 인류세를 지질학적 시대로 공식화하는 것에 반대하는 주요 이유는 무엇인가?
A. 인간 영향의 증거는 전 세계적으로 고르게 분포되어 있지 않다.
B. B) 전 세계적으로 적용 가능한 명확히 정의된 시작점이 부족하다.
C. C) 핵 낙진과 플라스틱은 지질학적 지표로 적합하지 않다.
D. D) 이 용어는 대중적 논의가 아닌 과학적 논의에만 유용하다.
✅ 正确答案
B) It lacks a clearly defined start point applicable worldwide.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first