The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch, defined by humanity's profound impact on Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels are stratigraphically distinct, warranting formal recognition. However, critics contend that the term lacks precise temporal boundaries, as human influence began gradually across different regions and eras, from early agriculture to industrialization. This ambiguity, they suggest, undermines its utility as a formal chronostratigraphic unit, which typically requires a clear global boundary stratotype. Despite this debate, the term has proven invaluable for interdisciplinary dialogue, prompting scientists to consider the long-term consequences of human activity beyond traditional historical timescales.
❓ What is the main reason some critics oppose formalizing the Anthropocene as a geological epoch?
A. A) The evidence for human impact is not globally distributed.
B. B) It lacks a clearly defined start point applicable worldwide.
C. C) Nuclear fallout and plastics are not suitable as geological markers.
D. D) The term is only useful for scientific, not public, discussions.
✅ 正确答案
B) It lacks a clearly defined start point applicable worldwide.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first