The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained considerable traction in geological and environmental discourse, positing that human activities have become a dominant force shaping Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels constitute a distinct stratigraphic signature, warranting a new geological epoch. However, critics contend that the term conflates geological time with historical time, and that the proposed markers are diachronous, appearing at different times across the globe. They suggest that formalizing the Anthropocene may obscure the uneven responsibility for environmental change, as industrial nations have contributed disproportionately to emissions compared to developing regions. Thus, the debate extends beyond scientific classification, touching upon geopolitical and ethical dimensions of environmental governance.