The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained considerable traction in geological and environmental discourse, positing that human activities have become a dominant force shaping Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels constitute a distinct stratigraphic signature, warranting a new geological epoch. However, critics contend that the term conflates geological time with historical time, and that the proposed markers are diachronous, appearing at different times across the globe. They suggest that formalizing the Anthropocene may obscure the uneven responsibility for environmental change, as industrial nations have contributed disproportionately to emissions compared to developing regions. Thus, the debate extends beyond scientific classification, touching upon geopolitical and ethical dimensions of environmental governance.
❓ Какова основная точка разногласий относительно антропоцена, согласно тексту?
A. Его стратиграфические маркеры слишком недавние, чтобы считаться геологическими.
B. Это может упускать из виду неравный вклад разных стран в изменение окружающей среды.
C. Это было отвергнуто всеми геологами из-за отсутствия доказательств.
D. Он слишком много внимания уделяет этическим вопросам, а не научным данным.
✅ 正确答案
Its stratigraphic markers are diachronous and the term may obscure uneven responsibility for environmental change.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first