The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in cross-cultural management research. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on intrapersonal and interpersonal skills, CQ specifically addresses an individual's capability to function effectively in culturally diverse settings. Scholars have identified four distinct dimensions of CQ: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral. The metacognitive component involves higher-order mental processes used to acquire cultural knowledge, while the cognitive dimension refers to factual understanding of cultural norms and practices. Motivational CQ reflects the drive to engage with other cultures, and behavioral CQ encompasses the ability to adapt verbal and nonverbal actions appropriately. Recent studies suggest that CQ is a stronger predictor of expatriate job performance than prior international experience, highlighting its importance in global talent management. However, critics argue that existing CQ measurements often rely on self-reporting, which may not accurately capture actual adaptive behavior in real-world interactions.
❓ 根据文章内容,以下哪项是对当前文化智力测量的主要批评?
A. A. 他们过分强调情商。
B. B. 他们未能区分元认知与认知维度。
C. C. 他们依赖自我报告的数据,这些数据可能无法反映实际行为。
D. D. 它们仅适用于外派人员,不适用于其他专业人士。
✅ 正确答案
C. They rely on self-reported data that may not reflect actual behavior.