The concept of 'environmental capital' has gained traction in ecological economics, positing that natural resources should be valued not merely as commodities but as assets that provide essential ecosystem services. This framework argues that sustainable development requires maintaining the stock of such capital, as its depletion can lead to irreversible losses in biodiversity and climate regulation. However, critics contend that assigning monetary values to nature oversimplifies complex ecological interdependencies and may prioritize market-based solutions over systemic change. A key challenge lies in balancing economic growth with the preservation of natural assets, particularly in developing regions where resource extraction often drives short-term prosperity. Ultimately, the debate underscores the need for interdisciplinary approaches that integrate ecological science with socioeconomic policy, rather than treating environmental concerns as externalities in traditional economic models.
❓ 지문에 따르면, '환경 자본' 접근법에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. 그것은 천연자원의 금전적 가치를 과대평가한다.
B. 그것은 생태계의 복잡성을 설명하지 못하며 시장 해결책을 선호할 수 있다.
C. 이는 개발도상 지역에서 생물다양성의 중요성을 무시하고 있다.
D. 체계적 변화에 너무 치중하고 실질적인 정책에는 소홀하다.
✅ 正确答案
It fails to account for the complexity of ecological systems and may favor market solutions.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first