雅思阅读

语言: 中文 English Español 日本語 한국어 Tiếng Việt ไทย Русский

📖 Reading Passage

The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by humanity's significant impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels distinguish this period from the Holocene. However, the formal recognition of the Anthropocene remains contentious. Critics within the geological community contend that the term lacks the precise stratigraphic boundaries required for official epoch status, as the proposed markers appear unevenly across different environments and timescales. Moreover, some scholars suggest that framing the current era as a geological epoch may inadvertently diminish human responsibility by implying a natural progression rather than a crisis driven by specific social and economic choices. This debate highlights a fundamental tension between scientific classification and the broader implications of naming our time.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 일부 학자들이 인류세를 지질학적 시대로 공식화하는 것에 반대하는 이유는 무엇인가?

✅ 正确答案

B. Because the term may obscure the role of human decisions in environmental change.

IELTS Reading Tips

🎯 在线练习并获得AI解析