The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by humanity's significant impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels distinguish this period from the Holocene. However, the formal recognition of the Anthropocene remains contentious. Critics within the geological community contend that the term lacks the precise stratigraphic boundaries required for official epoch status, as the proposed markers appear unevenly across different environments and timescales. Moreover, some scholars suggest that framing the current era as a geological epoch may inadvertently diminish human responsibility by implying a natural progression rather than a crisis driven by specific social and economic choices. This debate highlights a fundamental tension between scientific classification and the broader implications of naming our time.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 일부 학자들이 인류세를 지질학적 시대로 공식화하는 것에 반대하는 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A. 인간의 영향에 대한 증거가 너무 약해서 정확하게 측정할 수 없기 때문이다.
B. B. 왜냐하면 그 용어가 환경 변화에 있어 인간의 결정이 차지하는 역할을 모호하게 만들 수 있기 때문이다.
C. C. 지질학계가 새로운 세대(epoch) 명칭을 보편적으로 거부하기 때문이다.
D. D. 제안된 마커들이 여러 지역에 걸쳐 너무 일관적이기 때문이다.
✅ 正确答案
B. Because the term may obscure the role of human decisions in environmental change.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first