The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by humanity's significant impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels distinguish this period from the Holocene. However, the formal recognition of the Anthropocene remains contentious. Critics within the geological community contend that the term lacks the precise stratigraphic boundaries required for official epoch status, as the proposed markers appear unevenly across different environments and timescales. Moreover, some scholars suggest that framing the current era as a geological epoch may inadvertently diminish human responsibility by implying a natural progression rather than a crisis driven by specific social and economic choices. This debate highlights a fundamental tension between scientific classification and the broader implications of naming our time.
❓ According to the passage, why do some scholars object to formalizing the Anthropocene as a geological epoch?
A. A. Because the evidence for human impact is too weak to be measured accurately.
B. B. Because the term may obscure the role of human decisions in environmental change.
C. C. Because the geological community universally rejects any new epoch names.
D. D. Because the proposed markers are too consistent across different regions.
✅ 正确答案
B. Because the term may obscure the role of human decisions in environmental change.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first