The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch, characterized by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human activity. However, critics contend that these markers are not yet globally synchronous or long-lasting enough to define a distinct epoch, suggesting instead that the term 'Anthropocene' should remain a cultural or historical designation rather than a formal geological unit. This debate highlights the tension between scientific rigor and the need to communicate humanity's profound influence on the planet.
❓ Какова основная точка разногласий относительно «антропоцена», описанного в отрывке?
A. Достаточно ли значимо влияние человека, чтобы изменить геологические процессы
B. Являются ли предложенные маркеры достаточными и уместными для определения новой геологической эпохи
C. Следует ли использовать этот термин в публичном дискурсе об изменениях окружающей среды
D. Является ли пластиковое загрязнение более надёжным маркером, чем радиоактивные осадки
✅ 正确答案
Whether the proposed markers are sufficient and appropriate to define a new geological epoch
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first