The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch, characterized by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human activity. However, critics contend that these markers are not yet globally synchronous or long-lasting enough to define a distinct epoch, suggesting instead that the term 'Anthropocene' should remain a cultural or historical designation rather than a formal geological unit. This debate highlights the tension between scientific rigor and the need to communicate humanity's profound influence on the planet.
❓ 본문에서 설명된 '인류세(Anthropocene)'에 관한 주요 쟁점은 무엇인가?
A. 인간의 영향이 지질학적 과정을 변화시킬 만큼 충분히 중요한지 여부
B. 제안된 지표들이 새로운 지질 시대를 정의하기에 충분하고 적절한지 여부
C. 해당 용어가 환경 변화에 관한 공개 논의에서 사용되어야 하는지 여부
D. 플라스틱 오염이 핵 낙진보다 더 신뢰할 수 있는 지표인지 여부
✅ 正确答案
Whether the proposed markers are sufficient and appropriate to define a new geological epoch
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first