The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch, characterized by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human activity. However, critics contend that these markers are not yet globally synchronous or long-lasting enough to define a distinct epoch, suggesting instead that the term 'Anthropocene' should remain a cultural or historical designation rather than a formal geological unit. This debate highlights the tension between scientific rigor and the need to communicate humanity's profound influence on the planet.
❓ この文章で述べられている「人新世」に関する主な論点は何ですか？
A. 人間の影響が地質学的プロセスを変えるほど重大であるかどうか
B. 提案されたマーカーが新たな地質時代を定義するために十分かつ適切であるかどうか
C. この用語が環境変化に関する公の議論で使用されるべきかどうか
D. プラスチック汚染が核降下物よりも信頼性の高い指標であるかどうか
✅ 正确答案
Whether the proposed markers are sufficient and appropriate to define a new geological epoch
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first