The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been debated in geography. Early proponents argued that human societies are fundamentally shaped by their physical environment, such as climate and topography. However, this view was criticized for oversimplifying complex cultural developments and for justifying colonialism. Modern scholars, such as Jared Diamond, have revived interest in the topic but with more nuance, suggesting that environmental factors can influence, but not solely determine, societal outcomes. They emphasize the role of technological innovation and cultural exchange as mediators. This revised perspective acknowledges that while geography can pose constraints or offer opportunities, human agency and historical contingencies play equally crucial roles. Thus, the relationship between environment and society is seen as dynamic and interactive, rather than one-way deterministic.