The concept of emotional intelligence (EI) has garnered significant attention in organizational psychology, yet its operationalization remains contentious. While early models, such as Mayer and Salovey's ability-based framework, emphasize cognitive processing of emotions, mixed models incorporate personality traits like empathy and self-regulation. Proponents argue that EI predicts workplace performance beyond general intelligence, particularly in leadership roles. However, critics contend that self-report measures of EI suffer from social desirability bias, and that ability-based tests lack ecological validity. Recent meta-analyses suggest a modest incremental validity of EI over cognitive ability and personality, but effect sizes vary markedly across occupational contexts. Consequently, researchers advocate for a more nuanced approach, distinguishing between trait EI and ability EI, and examining moderators such as emotional labor demands and team dynamics. This scholarly debate underscores the necessity for rigorous, context-sensitive assessment tools before EI can be reliably applied in personnel selection and training programs.
❓ 지문에 따르면, EI의 자기 보고 측정 방식에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. A) 그것들은 관리하기에 너무 시간이 많이 소요된다.
B. B) 응답자들이 자신을 긍정적으로 보이려는 경향에 영향을 받는다.
C. C) 그들은 인지 능력에만 전적으로 초점을 맞춘다.
D. D) 높은 생태학적 타당성을 보이나 신뢰도는 낮다.
✅ 正确答案
B) They are influenced by respondents' tendency to present themselves favorably.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first