The concept of emotional intelligence (EI) has garnered significant attention in organizational psychology, yet its operationalization remains contentious. While early models, such as Mayer and Salovey's ability-based framework, emphasize cognitive processing of emotions, mixed models incorporate personality traits like empathy and self-regulation. Proponents argue that EI predicts workplace performance beyond general intelligence, particularly in leadership roles. However, critics contend that self-report measures of EI suffer from social desirability bias, and that ability-based tests lack ecological validity. Recent meta-analyses suggest a modest incremental validity of EI over cognitive ability and personality, but effect sizes vary markedly across occupational contexts. Consequently, researchers advocate for a more nuanced approach, distinguishing between trait EI and ability EI, and examining moderators such as emotional labor demands and team dynamics. This scholarly debate underscores the necessity for rigorous, context-sensitive assessment tools before EI can be reliably applied in personnel selection and training programs.
❓ この文章によると、EIの自己報告式測定法に対する主な批判は何ですか?
A. A) それらは実施するのに時間がかかりすぎる。
B. B) それらは、回答者が自分を好意的に見せようとする傾向に影響される。
C. C) 彼らは認知能力のみに焦点を当てている。
D. D)それらは高い生態学的妥当性を示すが、信頼性は低い。
✅ 正确答案
B) They are influenced by respondents' tendency to present themselves favorably.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first