The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence. However, critics contend that the term is more cultural than scientific, as the proposed markers are not uniformly distributed across geological strata and may not persist over the long timescales typical of formal geological divisions. This debate highlights the tension between scientific classification and societal narratives of environmental change.
❓ Согласно тексту, какова основная критика антропоцена как формальной геологической эпохи?
A. Его маркеры слишком равномерно распределены по всем геологическим слоям.
B. Его доказательства могут быть недостаточно последовательными или долговечными для геологической классификации.
C. Он слишком много внимания уделяет культурным влияниям, а не физическим доказательствам.
D. Оно переоценивает влияние человека на глобальные уровни углекислого газа.
✅ 正确答案
Its evidence may not be consistent or long-lasting enough for geological classification.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first