The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence. However, critics contend that the term is more cultural than scientific, as the proposed markers are not uniformly distributed across geological strata and may not persist over the long timescales typical of formal geological divisions. This debate highlights the tension between scientific classification and societal narratives of environmental change.
❓ この文章によると、人新世を正式な地質時代として扱うことに対する主な批判は何ですか？
A. そのマーカーは、すべての地層にわたって均等に分布しすぎている。
B. その証拠は、地質学的分類を行うには一貫性や持続性が十分でない可能性がある。
C. 文化的影響に焦点を当てすぎており、物的証拠にはあまり注目していない。
D. それは、地球規模の二酸化炭素濃度に対する人間の影響を過大評価している。
✅ 正确答案
Its evidence may not be consistent or long-lasting enough for geological classification.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first