The concept of ecosystem services has gained significant traction in environmental policy over the past two decades. These services, which include provisioning resources like food and water, regulating processes such as climate and flood control, and cultural benefits like recreation, are often undervalued in economic markets. This undervaluation leads to their overexploitation and degradation. To address this, researchers have proposed various valuation methods, including contingent valuation and hedonic pricing. However, critics argue that assigning monetary values to nature can oversimplify its intrinsic worth and lead to commodification. A more integrated approach, combining ecological indicators with socio-economic assessments, is increasingly recommended to ensure sustainable management while acknowledging both tangible and intangible benefits of natural systems.
❓ 批評家が生態系サービスの評価に関して提起する主な懸念は何ですか?
A. A. それは過度な経済成長につながる可能性がある。
B. B. 自然の価値を単なる金銭的な尺度に還元してしまう危険性がある。
C. C. それは気候調整の役割を無視している。
D. D. それは文化的な利益のみに焦点を当てている。
✅ 正确答案
B. It risks reducing nature's value to mere monetary terms.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first