The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction in geological circles as a proposed new epoch defined by human impact on Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels are distinct enough to warrant a formal boundary in the geological time scale. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies complex human-environment interactions and that the proposed markers may not be globally synchronous or long-lasting. They suggest that a more nuanced understanding of human influence, which accounts for regional variations and historical depth, is necessary before formalizing this epoch. This debate highlights the broader challenge of translating scientific observations into categorical frameworks that can both capture planetary change and remain analytically rigorous.
❓ この文章で述べられている「人新世」の正式化に関する主な論点は何ですか?
A. A) 人間の影響が地球のシステムを変えるほど重大であるかどうか。
B. B) 提案されたマーカーが十分に明確であり、地球規模で同時性があり、かつ持続的であるかどうか。
C. C) 地質時代区分に、人間の影響を受けた時代を含めるべきかどうか。
D. D) 核降下物やプラスチック汚染が人間の活動によって引き起こされるかどうか。
✅ 正确答案
B) Whether proposed markers are sufficiently distinct, globally synchronous, and enduring.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first