The concept of 'sustainable development' has evolved significantly since its popularization in the 1987 Brundtland Report. Initially, it emphasized the balance between economic growth and environmental protection for future generations. However, recent scholarly critiques argue that this framework often prioritizes economic metrics over ecological integrity, leading to 'weak sustainability' where natural capital can be depleted if replaced by man-made capital. In contrast, 'strong sustainability' posits that certain natural resources are non-substitutable and must be preserved independently. This debate has practical implications for policy-making, particularly in developing nations where economic pressures may overshadow long-term environmental goals. A growing body of literature suggests that integrating indigenous knowledge systems with scientific approaches could offer more holistic solutions, yet institutional barriers remain significant. Thus, while the term 'sustainability' is ubiquitous, its operationalization remains contested and context-dependent.
❓ この文章によると、「弱い持続可能性」と「強い持続可能性」の主な違いは何ですか?
A. 弱い持続可能性は、自然資本が人工資本によって完全に代替されることを許容するが、強い持続可能性はそれを許容しない。
B. 弱い持続可能性は経済成長のみに焦点を当て、強い持続可能性は環境保護のみに焦点を当てる。
C. 弱い持続可能性は先進国で適用され、強い持続可能性は発展途上国で適用される。
D. 弱い持続可能性は将来世代を無視する一方、強い持続可能性は彼らを優先する。
✅ 正确答案
Weak sustainability allows for complete substitution of natural capital by man-made capital, while strong sustainability does not.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first