The concept of 'sustainable development' has evolved significantly since its popularization in the 1987 Brundtland Report. Initially, it emphasized the balance between economic growth and environmental protection for future generations. However, recent scholarly critiques argue that this framework often prioritizes economic metrics over ecological integrity, leading to 'weak sustainability' where natural capital can be depleted if replaced by man-made capital. In contrast, 'strong sustainability' posits that certain natural resources are non-substitutable and must be preserved independently. This debate has practical implications for policy-making, particularly in developing nations where economic pressures may overshadow long-term environmental goals. A growing body of literature suggests that integrating indigenous knowledge systems with scientific approaches could offer more holistic solutions, yet institutional barriers remain significant. Thus, while the term 'sustainability' is ubiquitous, its operationalization remains contested and context-dependent.
❓ 지문에 따르면, '약한 지속가능성'과 '강한 지속가능성' 사이의 핵심 차이점은 무엇인가?
A. 약한 지속가능성은 자연 자본이 인간이 만든 자본으로 완전히 대체되는 것을 허용하지만, 강한 지속가능성은 이를 허용하지 않는다.
B. 약한 지속가능성은 경제 성장에만 초점을 맞추는 반면, 강한 지속가능성은 환경 보호에만 초점을 맞춘다.
C. 약한 지속가능성은 선진국에서 적용되는 반면, 강한 지속가능성은 개발도상국에서 적용된다.
D. 약한 지속가능성은 미래 세대를 무시하는 반면, 강한 지속가능성은 그들을 우선시한다.
✅ 正确答案
Weak sustainability allows for complete substitution of natural capital by man-made capital, while strong sustainability does not.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first