The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been a contentious issue in geography. Early proponents argued that human activities and societal development were largely dictated by climatic and geographical conditions. However, this perspective was criticized for oversimplifying complex human-environment interactions and for its potential to justify colonialism. Modern scholarship, such as that by Jared Diamond, has revived interest in the role of geography in shaping historical outcomes, but with more nuance. Diamond posits that geographical factors, such as the availability of domesticable species and the orientation of continental axes, influenced the uneven development of civilizations. Yet, he acknowledges that these factors are not deterministic but rather provide a framework within which human agency and cultural choices operate. Thus, contemporary environmental geography emphasizes a reciprocal relationship, where humans modify their environment while being influenced by it, rejecting both strict determinism and the idea that environment has no impact at all.