The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been a contentious issue in geography. Early proponents argued that human activities and societal development were largely dictated by climatic and geographical conditions. However, this perspective was criticized for oversimplifying complex human-environment interactions and for its potential to justify colonialism. Modern scholarship, such as that by Jared Diamond, has revived interest in the role of geography in shaping historical outcomes, but with more nuance. Diamond posits that geographical factors, such as the availability of domesticable species and the orientation of continental axes, influenced the uneven development of civilizations. Yet, he acknowledges that these factors are not deterministic but rather provide a framework within which human agency and cultural choices operate. Thus, contemporary environmental geography emphasizes a reciprocal relationship, where humans modify their environment while being influenced by it, rejecting both strict determinism and the idea that environment has no impact at all.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 초기 환경 결정론과 재러드 다이아몬드와 같은 현대 학문 사이의 주요 차이점은 무엇인가?
A. 초기의 결정론은 기후를 완전히 무시한 반면, 다이아몬드는 기후에 초점을 맞춘다.
B. 다이아몬드의 관점은 인간의 주체성을 고려하여 더욱 세밀한 반면, 초기의 결정론은 지나치게 단순했다.
C. 현대 학계는 지리학이 인간 사회에 미치는 영향에 대해 완전히 부정한다.
D. 초기의 결정론은 경험적 증거에 기반한 반면, 다이아몬드의 연구는 순전히 이론적이다.
✅ 正确答案
Diamond's view is more nuanced, considering human agency, whereas early determinism was overly simplistic.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first