The concept of 'environmental justice' emerged in the late 20th century as a response to the disproportionate burden of environmental hazards borne by marginalized communities. Scholars argue that pollution, toxic waste sites, and climate change impacts are not evenly distributed, often correlating with socioeconomic status and race. This framework challenges traditional environmentalism, which frequently prioritizes wilderness preservation over human well-being. Instead, it advocates for equitable policies that consider the voices of affected populations in decision-making processes. Recent studies highlight that integrating local knowledge with scientific data leads to more sustainable and fair outcomes. However, critics note that the term's broad application can dilute its political potency, as governments may adopt superficial measures without addressing systemic inequalities. Thus, environmental justice remains a dynamic and contested field, reflecting deeper societal struggles over resource allocation and power.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 비평가들이 언급한 환경 정의 프레임워크의 주요 한계는 무엇인가?
A. A. 그것은 인간 공동체보다 야생 보존에 너무 초점을 맞추고 있다.
B. B. 그 광범위한 사용은 근본적인 불평등을 해결하는 데 있어 그 효과를 약화시킬 수 있다.
C. C. 그것은 정책 결정에 있어 과학적 데이터의 역할을 무시한다.
D. D. 영향을 받는 인구의 목소리를 고려하지 못한다.
✅ 正确答案
B. Its broad usage may weaken its effectiveness in tackling fundamental inequities.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first