The concept of 'environmental justice' emerged in the late 20th century as a response to the disproportionate burden of environmental hazards borne by marginalized communities. Scholars argue that pollution, toxic waste sites, and climate change impacts are not evenly distributed, often correlating with socioeconomic status and race. This framework challenges traditional environmentalism, which frequently prioritizes wilderness preservation over human well-being. Instead, it advocates for equitable policies that consider the voices of affected populations in decision-making processes. Recent studies highlight that integrating local knowledge with scientific data leads to more sustainable and fair outcomes. However, critics note that the term's broad application can dilute its political potency, as governments may adopt superficial measures without addressing systemic inequalities. Thus, environmental justice remains a dynamic and contested field, reflecting deeper societal struggles over resource allocation and power.
❓ 文章によると、批判者たちが言及する環境正義の枠組みの主な限界は何ですか?
A. A. それは人間のコミュニティよりも荒野の保護に焦点を当てすぎている。
B. B. その広範な使用は、根本的な不平等に対処する上での効果を弱める可能性がある。
C. C. 政策決定における科学的データの役割を無視している。
D. D. 影響を受ける人々の声を考慮に入れていない。
✅ 正确答案
B. Its broad usage may weaken its effectiveness in tackling fundamental inequities.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first