The concept of 'environmental justice' emerged in the late 20th century as a response to the disproportionate burden of environmental hazards borne by marginalized communities. Scholars argue that pollution, toxic waste sites, and climate change impacts are not evenly distributed, often correlating with socioeconomic status and race. This framework challenges traditional environmentalism, which frequently prioritizes wilderness preservation over human well-being. Instead, it advocates for equitable policies that consider the voices of affected populations in decision-making processes. Recent studies highlight that integrating local knowledge with scientific data leads to more sustainable and fair outcomes. However, critics note that the term's broad application can dilute its political potency, as governments may adopt superficial measures without addressing systemic inequalities. Thus, environmental justice remains a dynamic and contested field, reflecting deeper societal struggles over resource allocation and power.
❓ 根据文章所述,批评者提到的环境正义框架的主要局限性是什么?
A. A. 它过于注重荒野保护,而非人类社区。
B. B. 其广泛的应用可能会削弱其在解决根本性不平等问题上的效力。
C. C. 它忽视了科学数据在政策制定中的作用。
D. D. 它未能考虑到受影响群体的声音。
✅ 正确答案
B. Its broad usage may weaken its effectiveness in tackling fundamental inequities.