The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained considerable traction in geological and environmental circles, positing that human activity has become a dominant force shaping the Earth's systems, surpassing natural processes. Proponents argue that the proliferation of synthetic materials, significant alterations to the carbon cycle, and unprecedented biodiversity loss constitute a distinct stratigraphic signature. However, critics contend that the term lacks formal chronological precision, as its proposed start date varies from the advent of agriculture to the mid-20th century nuclear era. This ambiguity complicates its utility as a formal geological unit, yet it underscores a broader debate about humanity's role in planetary change. Ultimately, the discourse surrounding the Anthropocene reflects not only scientific inquiry but also ethical considerations regarding intergenerational responsibility and environmental stewardship.
❓ 지문에 따르면, '인류세'라는 용어에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. 그것은 지구를 형성하는 데 있어 자연적 과정의 역할을 과도하게 강조한다.
B. 인간 활동으로 인한 생물다양성 손실을 설명하지 못한다.
C. 그것은 지질학적 시간에서 정확하고 합의된 시작점이 부족하다.
D. 과학계의 대다수에 의해 거부되었습니다.
✅ 正确答案
It lacks a precise and agreed-upon starting point in geological time.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first